Short films have several key conventions that really distinguish them from the feature length films. These differences can range from simply being the amount of characters to the budget and most importantly the length of the film because that's how it is identified as a short film.
·
Characters
- The characters in the short film are probably one of the most important
things in the film. This is because the film relies on the appeal of the
characters and the way that the actors can portray the characters. The heavy
reliance on the characters stems from the lack of time that the short films
allow directors. For example;
o
A feature length film starring
Tom Cruise such as Oblivion has the ability to feature boring and plane 1
dimensional characters because people are not paying or wanting to see
interesting characters, most of the audiences for the big budget action flicks
want to see explosions, intense action and a dramatic conclusion. For them it
is more so about the ride than about whose nit with them. On the other hand, certain
feature length films can fully develop anything between 1 and 10 main
characters fully as thy have the time.
o
However,
Short films have the potential to develop one or two characters, if that! This is
because of the time constraint that is placed on the short films.
·
Plot
Twists – short films require a dramatic flair that can be added through the use
of a twist. Without the aforementioned twist a short film could be preserved as
boring or uninteresting. Of course twists happen in feature length films but
the twists are almost a necessity for short films.
·
Budgets
– In terms of budget it is fairly obvious that short films contain lower
budgets. Short films are normally restricted to a small budget as they only
tend to be little projects. As with everything there are films that break these
conventions but it is quite rare to see a short film with a big budget.
No comments:
Post a Comment